Science in the UK − whereto now?

نویسنده

  • Stephen Bustin
چکیده

Humour in Britain is appreciated for its quirkiness and ironic elf-deprecation and can sometimes seem baffling to the outside orld. The outcome of the recent United Kingdom referendum here a narrow-ish majority voted to leave the European Union s certainly perplexing to most onlookers and, if its consequences ere not so far-reaching, might be laughed off as an illustration of uch absurd humour. One of the most farcical aspects of the vote s that no one has any idea what “Brexit” actually means no matter ow often the ignorant slogan “Brexit means Brexit” is repeated. owever, an immediate consequence is that the uncertainties creted by the vote, and its potential impact on science, continues o be the subject of widespread, anxious and incredulous debate mongst scientists in the UK and between their many friends and ollaborators in the world-wide scientific community. Objectively, t is difficult to discern a single coherent argument that can be made or Brexit, and there can be little doubt that the human, societal and nancial implications of this needless debacle could be both wide eaching and damaging. UK science is highly competitive and EU and UK researchers ave become linked in an extensive collaborative network that has een of immense benefit to UK (and EU) science, with levels of nter-country collaborations within the EU (13%) similar to those f inter-state collaborations within the USA (16%) [1]. Together ith scientists from other EU countries, British scientists comrise around 22% of researchers worldwide, way ahead of the USA 17%) [2]. European researchers are also productive as measured y publications and author around 34% of the world’s research oututs, with the USA trailing at 23% [1]. Between 2005 and 2014, K researcher output rose from 70,201 to 87,948, second only to ermany (73,573–91,631) and way ahead of next-placed France 52,476–65,086). Indeed, for publications in biological and medial sciences, British authors are the most prolific by far (Fig. 1). UK nstitutions have been awarded by far the most research grants y the European Research Council [3], which funds individual rojects solely on the basis of their scientific excellence and so elps researchers bypass what is sometimes perceived as a less bjective distribution of monies from national research councils. etween 2007 and 2015, the UK accounted for 639/3056 grants, ith next-placed Germany obtaining 440. The UK has been simiarly successful with the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme, with nearly 2% of the applications received under the first 100 calls accounting or 15% of the available funding [4]. The Royal Society reckons from ata released by the UK Office of National Statistics that between 007 and 2013 the UK received a net amount of D 2.9 billion in direct

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparing the Active Centers in the Area of Ethics in Science and Technology in the US, UK, China and India

Background: Nowadays, life increasingly relies on inclusive scientific and technological infrastructures. Today, the use of technology has been manifested in all aspects of people's lives, so that decision-making processes in all aspects are based on the indicators of science and technology. Science has even come up with issues such as ethics and tradition, so traditional issues of ethics in th...

متن کامل

Whereto transhumanism? The literature reaches a critical mass.

When there are many people who don't need to expect something more than the benefits to take, we will suggest you to have willing to reach all benefits. Be sure and surely do to take this whereto transhumanism the literature reaches a critical mass essay that gives the best reasons to read. When you really need to get the reason why, this whereto transhumanism the literature reaches a critical ...

متن کامل

Making Research Matter; Comment on “Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal”

We offer a UK-based commentary on the recent “Perspective” published in IJHPM by Thakkar and Sullivan. We are sympathetic to the authors’ call for increased funding for health service and policy research (HSPR). However, we point out that increasing that investment – in any of the three countries they compare: Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom– will ipso facto not necessarily lea...

متن کامل

A glance at the move from complementary alternative medicine (CAM) to integrative medicine in the United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), and World Health Organization (WHO)'s health care systems

Today's medical world has gained a growing appeal towards CAM/TM which can be seen in the strategies of US in the form of establishing National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy (WHCCAMP) at the White House, the annual increase of integration of CAM clas...

متن کامل

A glance at the move from complementary alternative medicine (CAM) to integrative medicine in the United Kingdom (UK), United States (US), and World Health Organization (WHO)'s health care systems

Today's medical world has gained a growing appeal towards CAM/TM which can be seen in the strategies of US in the form of establishing National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and White House Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Policy (WHCCAMP) at the White House, the annual increase of integration of CAM clas...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016